Defining health inequality: why Rawls suceeds where social welfare theory fails

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V8K-44VG4WC-1/2/cd424239ffaa9d9389d83365749b79df
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6V8K-44VG4WC-1-S&_cdi=5873&_user=984616&_orig=na&_coverDate=05%2F31%2F2002&_sk=999789996&view=c&wchp=dGLbVtb-zSkWA&md5=35b9611f25e31e9d4553a7b0b8f01697&ie=/sdarticle.pdf

They propose an alternative approach which is more closely linked to the WHO concept of equity in health and is also consistent with the ethical principles espoused by Rawls........(Au) (vol. 21, issue 3, May 2002, pp.497-513)

Author(s): Bommier, Antoine, Stecklov, Guy Originator(s): Jornal of health economics
Resource added in: 28/05/2002
Available languages: English
Quality of Health Care, Social Welfare, Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation
  • Share
  • Suggest tag
    [X]
    Suggestions
    Separated by comma
    [X]
    Thank you for your suggestion.
    Communication problem. Please try again later.
  • Report error
    [X]
    Reason
    New Link (Optional)
    [X]
    Thank you for your report.
    Communication problem. Please try again later.
comments powered by Disqus

More related